You give to Europe eggs! I love the animals useful - in particular. Let at this love also there is some share of self-interest, but has put it does not change. However, when numerous messages «Europe struggles for the rights of hens!» Have captivated pages of newspapers, I have not tested pleasure. Yes, of course, layers should rush in good conditions, differently at them will decrease ÿéöåíîñêîñòü. Where without eggs. But here double standards somehow not to liking.
What turns out? If it is a question about the European Union countries intensive struggle for the rights is conducted, let even hens. If speech about the weak countries dependent on external financial injections sights cardinally vary. One screwing up of nuts in social policy of that costs. And after all it not hens. They are children, large families, old men. I understand, they of eggs do not bear also concrete profit cannot give. But my notorious female logic does not wish to be reconciled with reason: the person is more important than a silly bird?
And can, it I silly? If for hens achieve a separate personal living space not less than 750 sq. see on soul, a personal perch and a separate drinking bowl, means, it is necessary for someone? And if to peasants limit access to formation, all bar none are going to reduce access to medicine, and real incomes constantly fall because of inflation - means, it too is necessary for someone? Perhaps I the weak mind cannot simply capture all grandness of plans? Or at me the logic has given up? Earlier after all whom protected? Vanishing species. If the population of Moldova is reduced which year all by accelerated rates, and the quantity of the European hens constantly grows - who should be protected? Of whom it is necessary to care? Where you, kind ãðèíïèñîâöû? Àó!
Nadejda Degtiareva, photo by Valerii Corcimari.