The person to the person - who, the truth who? Recently have gathered the big company. The feast, jokes, then, as is accepted, a policy. Oh, that here has begun. These is for right, those is for left. Will not believe, nearly перессорились. And after all old, there are enough close friends. And to divide to us there is nothing. And the policy, by and large, us does not concern. In sense, we can talk, and change something - hardly. However passions boiled the serious.
And I sat, listened and thought: what for? Really that for conversation not to find any more? And whether it is necessary so to swear because of political views? Well, what the clod a difference, in what is trusted by me and to whom friend Vasja or girlfriend Masha trusts. What for with foam at a mouth to prove and struggle what in any case remains only words?
Will tell, it is not right? Yes, I remember, there was such term "conciliation". Well and let, brand. Already there were historical examples when the brother went on the brother, and the son informed on the father. It would be desirable repetitions? Without me.
The Internet boils and gurgles. Under any message on any political event set of comments. Besides discussion is seldom kept in correct frameworks. Already discussion of mental faculties of participants begins with the third-fourth comment and an origin of their parents. By the way, do not know, such inequality whence undertook: as a patronymic - so on the father and how to send - just on mother? I not the feminist, but am somehow insulting …
However, has distracted. I do not know, who for what, and personally I - for the world and mutual respect. To me my friends to road, also I chose them not on a party accessory.
Nadejda Degtiareva, photo by Valerii Corcimari.